ALTHOUGH THE TITLE sounds like a clickbait one, I can assure the reader that it is rooted in the Qur’an itself. Permit me the indulgence to explain:

I. the Victory

The Holy Qur’an says: Truly Our word to Our servants, the Messengers, has gone forth: Indeed it is they who shall be victorious. [Q.37:171-2]

Ibn Taymiyyah reminds us that victory (nasr), or being victorious (mansurun), isn’t restricted to the usual sense of the term as in defeating one’s opponent or vanquishing them. He says that it is broader than that. Responding to the objection that how can Allah’s Messengers all be described as victorious when many of them were slain without them or their message of tawhid prevailing, he explains:

‘Being killed, if it is upon a manner wherein there is honour for Islam and its people, then this is from the perfection of victory. For death is inevitable. So if one dies pleased with [Allah and] the Afterlife, then one has achieved untainted victory … A case in point is the hadith of the young boy, as related by Muslim (no.3005), when he followed the religion of the monk, after following the religion of the magician, and they attempted to repeatedly kill him but were unable to do so, until he taught them how to kill him. This was by [telling] the king to say: “In the name of Allah, Lord of the young boy.” then they shot him [with an arrow]. When they killed him, all the people believed. Thus this was victory for his religion.’1

Taking our queue from this Taymiyyan insight, we can look at what is now happening to the Palestinians in Gaza with a fresh perspective, to see that Allah has already given them and us victory. Let’s remind ourselves of some of these God-given victories:

Although the Muslim ummah continues to be woefully divided on a whole host of issues, the Palestinian cause is one around which the entire ummah unifies; and this time, like never before. When hearts are together, and voices resound with a common word, this is a clear victory. (Of course, more meaningful or lasting unity will only come about when we honour the ijma‘-ijtihad rule – i.e. unite upon issues of clear scholarly consensus, and not split over valid scholarly differences.)

The strength and courage with which false narratives undermining Palestinian resistance or the atrocities against them have been skilfully countered this time around, or how the whitewashing of the occupation or its war crimes has been so thoroughly and publicly debunked, is an undeniable victory.

Against the odds, alternative media voices have broken through in a huge way to expose the sheer scale of the double-standards of mainstream media outlets. This cannot be underestimated. Again, it’s a staggering victory. And while such alternative voices have always been there, this time, thanks to social media – in the main – the counter narrative has gone viral!

From a purely Muslim perspective, there are victories yet greater:

We see how the Palestinian cause serves as a means by which many Muslims are becoming more mindful or tuned to the reality of what it truly means to be a ‘submitter’ to Allah; a Muslim. And that is no small victory.

More and more Muslims are coming to realise that our socio-political affairs as an ummah are deeply intertwined with us actualisation taqwa in our own lives and turning our backs on sin and disobedience. This ever-growing recognition is one of the greatest victories we could ever be given.

The Palestinian commitment to iman, in the face of all the obstacles, and their courage and optimism in the face of a goliath of a persecution, is an inspiration to all who struggle with their faith in these challenging times to also patiently persevere and press on for Allah’s sake. How can this not be a victory?

As for them being slain, shot or bombed in this resistance for Allah, then their martyrdom – for that is our hope and prayer for them – is the envy of every true believer in whose heart the light of tawhid and the flames of striving still burn ever bright. For only the Muslim can say: ‘Our dead are in jannah!‘ If that is not being victorious, then what is?


There is an awakening among Muslims, and I find this to be so especially in the younger generation, that we Muslims must be responsive, but not reactionary. In other words, we must duly respond to calamities and tragedies as best as we can, without losing sight of growing our own communities in moral beauty and economic wellbeing, developing higher institutions of learning, as well as not sacrificing the call to Allah at the altar of political activism. Such intuition, or understanding, when it comes from middle-aged minds is one thing. But when it comes from younger minds, this is nothing short of a breathtaking victory in wisdom and foresight.

Likewise, there is now a far godlier awakening in the ummah that we cannot be attending demonstrations (leaving the scholarly difference about its legality, or about its efficacy) and yet not attend to our five daily prayers, and our other personal religious obligations (fara’id). That would be to lose the plot.

There is even an awakening, long in the coming, that our tongues cannot chant protest slogans for Palestinian freedom, more than they invoke the Holy Name of Allah and His remembrance. Again, that would be to shoot oneself in the foot.

There is an awakening that it is not enough just to expose political hypocrisy or media bias and double-standards, or get caught up in a tit for tat information war. Instead, there is du‘a, prayer, humanitarian aid, deepening our convictions in the Quranic world view rather than in secular liberalism’s and, of course, da‘wah – our primary objective here, and what validates our living here.

Then there is an awakening about the reality of the conflict, and how it is not about the Jews, per se; nor is it primarily about the actual land being blessed, nor al-Aqsa. Instead, it is about a principle. Imagine, for a moment, if we were to replace the Jews with atheists or Buddhists, and they did exactly the same thing, in exactly the same way. Our duty and response would be exactly the same. Why? Because it isn’t about who the people are. It’s about what they have done and are doing. In other words, the resistance against occupation is based on a principle, not on personalities or peoples. Likewise, if this happened in Mauritania, for instance, and the people were occupied, we would be duty-bound to resist – despite the land not being ‘blessed’ nor having al-Aqsa. That the holy land is blessed, and that it has the third most Sacred Mosque, makes the situation worse. But the principle still stands.

What we might now need is an awakening about boycotting. Again, leaving aside the nuanced scholarly discussion around the validity or not of boycotting (not as a personal act, but as part of a national or transnational coordinated act by those living in Muslim majority countries with Muslim heads of state) we need to ask: Is it right that I strategically boycott a multinational corporation and get all strict about it, yet not make any serious effort to boycott the clear haram in my own life in terms of what I do, what I say, or what I watch?

The Prophet said: ‘The Muslim is one from whom other Muslims are safe from his tongue and hands, and the one who migrates (Ar, muhajir – boycott, shun, flee from, migrate from) is one who boycotts [shuns] what Allah has made haram.’2

Overall, however, there is a godly awakening and a slow, but evolving political maturity; and they too are decisive victories.


Like in other calamities, conflicts or trials of this nature, the plan of action is threefold. There is the immediate or short term action, the medium term, and the long term.

Immediate action is, of course, humanitarian aid to the victims and refugees. Money, medical supplies, doctors or other skilled personnel are the types of services and aid the situation needs, as well as contributing to the efforts of relief agencies and humanitarian convoys. Along with this, we must not ignore the power of invoking Allah with du‘a. We feel the anguish that the oppressed do, and should pray like they do: ‘Our Lord! Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors! And give us from Your presence a protecting friend; give us from Your presence a defender!’ [Q.4:75]

Mid-term action has got to be to work for an immediate ceasefire (the global demonstrations, along with voicing righteous anger, are chiefly about this), so that aid and humanitarian relief can get through and some semblance of peace and security is established.  Mid-term does not mean that one works for it only after the humanitarian aid is delivered. A ceasefire or cessation of bombing and killing must be brokered now.

As to the long-term action, this is about finding a resolution to the conflict and occupation. For Muslims, that involves being wisely guided by the light of sound religious instruction and realpolitik. For while the fire in some hearts is seasoned, and in others yet young, believers must be steered – even in their politics – by sacred knowledge. For however they move, and in whatever they do, the believer seeks the glory of God and must intend to conform to His Will and ways. 

Two sacred principles must be kept in mind here. Both are backed up by a classical scholarly consensus. The first is that women, children and all other non-combatants cannot be intentionally targeted and killed in any war or resistance.3

The second is that affairs of war or peace (and whatever is in between) is the decision of those in whose hand is executive political authority4 – in this case, the political leaders of the West Bank and, separately, the Gaza Strip. The former accepts the premise of a two state solution; the Palestinian state being on that of the 1967 borders. The latter has changed its original 1988 position, and as of 2017, also accepts a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders. For while all Palestinians dream of liberating historic Palestine, today, those at the helm of Palestinian governance are working on a realistic solution. They are focused on what they can achieve, as opposed to what they dream for.

Both authorities expect such a state to be fully sovereign and autonomous, and with the right of return. And despite the skewered propaganda about this too, such a state and with the right of return is – with all its multifaceted concerns and complexities – theoretically doable.

Of course, this will depend on the occupiers, the heads of which still voice a number of positions. These range from a suggestive genocide of Palestinians, to driving them out to neighbouring states, all the way to a two-state, toothless tiger solution. 

The hope is that the resistance, whatever it does, takes the moral high ground and does not eclipse the long term call to tawhid for short term political gains. For as long as we continue wearing the uniform of iman and humility, Allah will honour us with further victories over those who wear the uniform of genocidal brutality.

That is our conviction!

1. Cited in Ibn ‘Abd al-Hadi, Ikhtiyarat Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Makkah: Dar ‘Alam al-Fawa’id, 1424H), 70-71.

2. Al-Bukhari, no.10; Muslim, no.40.

3. The shari‘ah proofs for this are discussed in my article, Jihad & Martyrdom, War & Peace:

4. The proofs are discussed in the article above.

11 thoughts on “Palestine: Victory is Already Here!

  1. Thank you Shaykh for your insightful thoughts as always.

    I do however think that your long-term two-state solution is wishful thinking now. What happened this year is bound to happen again and once again we’ll be asking for a ceasefire after thousands of Muslim brothers and sisters are killed and massacred. What is the point of the resistance and its accomplishments IF you are asking them to return to square one? Israel is more brutal and vile than ever before and yet we expect that to respect international law, human rights and their promise even though they should never be trusted. This is our clockwork response.

    Isn’t it time for us to to unite Muslims and remind them that the only solution to this crisis and all the oppression Muslims are going to in Yemen, Syria, India, China and around the world? Why not ask Muslims to work towards establishing Muslim political strength that eventually produces the likes of Salah Uddin Ayyubi.

    Wasn’t this the ultimate victory of Suleh Hudabiya – Fatahe Makkah?

    1. Allah bless you for your comment, Muhsin. As the article stated, the political decision, as per the shari’ah rule, rests with the authorities in Palestine. Whilst scholars and other relevant actors (like seasoned scholars, other heads of states or governments, and people with socio-political clout) can indeed advise such authorities in terms of perceived political follies or feasibility, the ultimate decision is theirs. It is, I’m sure you’ll agree, incorrect to say it is my opinion. In fact, that was my intended point. They are the ones taking the brunt, and they know best their affairs.

  2. Jazak Allah Khair for an interesting and thought provoking article. I am still none the wiser on the intricacies of everything that is happening and the political implications of actions taken or not taken by those in power and ordinary people like myself.

    I sometimes feel useless and hopeless in my actions on what I can do to help my fellow Muslim brothers and sisters in Palestine, Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan and other countries, where they are being opressed and suppressed. I feel totally helpless in the magnanimity of this whole situation.
    Then I remember, what I’ve learnt along the way in my life and from experience; even if I’m unable to go on protest marches, attend various talks, debates and forums on solutions, donate large sums of money to various causes to help our brother and sisters, then the very least I can do and am able to do, by tte Grace and Mercy of Allah, is to make dua for them all and for Allah to bring Peace to Palestine and wherever our Muslim brothers and sisters are suffering.

    Allah hears every dua’a and dua’a is the most powerful action we can all do readily and easily InshaAllah. If this is the very least we can do, then we should all be doing it, from the very deepest recesses of our hearts and with all our fervour and absolute conviction.

    May Allah hear and answer all.our dua’as and have mercy on all the Myslims who are suffering around the world.

    (I apologise for the lengthy post)

    1. Indeed, if we can’t get out there, then du’a, raising awareness, strategic boycotting of certain goods and services (as per the BDS suggestions) and helping towards the humanitarian aid is what we should be doing.

      As for a historic overview of the issue, and trying to fill in some of the details, I’ve sent you a few links on your WhatsApp.

      Finally, amin to your du’as.

  3. I don’t see the necessity in attending a protest just because it MAY help. Allah already told us what to do in times of calamity, people- for some reason, don’t think that’s enough and have decided to over extend the means to achieve their goal. Call upon Allah, make tawbah, rectify yourselves, return to following the Sunnah and any other halal means to aid the Ummah, charity, medical aid, even fight if commanded by the ruler etc. but for some to say that the protests are a necessity inspite of all that, comes across to me as if the word daroora* is being misunderstood or misapplied.

    On top of that, what’s the evidence that Allaah is even pleased with this action[protesting**]? An action in which the people are falling into various haram- imitating disbelievers, free-mixing, things Allaah has made Haram for us, what’s the evidence that Allaah is pleased by that? What makes you think Allaah is going to be pleased should you or someone else turn up with this deed on yawmul qiyaamah? Because some say “if Allaah asks you, what did you do?”, then these individuals could present this deed(protests), so if it is something you are doing to please Allaah then it is an act of worship, and if it is an act of worship then there are two pillars that need to be fulfilled for it to be accepted and those are 1. It is done based upon knowledge 2. It is in adherence to the Sunnah. But this act is not from the Sunnah at all, the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not use it nor his companions nor the first generations even though they had enemies and it was at their disposal.

    daroora was initially made mention of by myself to the author of the above words to highlight how for eg. a scholar in saudi arabia (under a muslim ruler) whilst of the opinion that protests should only happen IF the ruler allows it, may not hold that position under a non muslim country (UK) and therefore even if such scholar witnessed pockets of wrong doing being committed by muslims in a protest, he most likely wouldn’t tell people to pack their bags and go home because some people spoiled it by transgressing. Reason for this being out of necessity (daroora) of the wider reaching implications NOT protesting may have (essentially giving the ball to the other team to score infinite “goals”)

    ** is an addition by myself for clarity.

    If i promise i’m not dragging you into a bickering contest with my sibling, and thereby hoping to score a point- would you kindly help me explore this belief of theirs in as balanced a way as you possibly can for the sake of improving my understanding of my fellow muslim?

    May Allah increase your good deeds and reward you abundantly in this world and the next good sheikh,
    Wasalaamu alaykum

Leave a Reply